The Myth That Divorce Benefits
Men EconomicallyCurrent
Child Support Levels Often Leave
Noncustodial Parents with a Lower
Standard of Living than Custodial
Parents
In part because of
the myth that divorced fathers gain
economically from divorce while
women suffer from it, child support
levels have steadily increased over
the past two decades. Research shows
that levels have now reached such a
point that in many states, child
support guidelines mean that
custodial parents enjoy a better
standard of living than noncustodial
parents, sometimes dramatically so.
Two Arizona State
university professors recently
examined the child support
guidelines of seven geographically
and politically diverse states. The
researchers conclude that "under
current child support guidelines,
the majority of custodial parents
currently have higher standards of
living than their matched
noncustodial parents."
The study,
"Child Support Guidelines and the
Equalization of Living Standards,"
was conducted by psychology
professors Sanford Braver and David
Stockburger, and appears in the book
The Law and Economics of Child
Support Payments.
The authors conclude that the
support guidelines are tilted
against noncustodial parents in part
because they fail to consider the
large tax benefits custodial parents
enjoy, as well as noncustodial
parents' child-related expenses.
Whereas child support income is
tax-free to the custodial parent,
noncustodial parents must pay
federal, state, and local income
tax, as well as social security or
FICA, on the money they pay in
support. Also, in most cases only
the custodial parent can claim the
$3,050 per child tax exemption.
Additional custodial parent tax
advantages include: the Child Tax
Credit (worth up to $1,000 per
child); the Earned Income Credit (up
to $4,204, with two children);
deductions for school tuition and
fees (up to $3,000 per return); the
Child Care Credit (worth up to
$1,050 per child); a lower tax rate
for "head of household" filing
status; and numerous others.
While noncustodial parents pay
part of these expenses through child
support or direct court orders, they
are not allowed the concomitant tax
deductions. The federal tax code
treats divorced and unwed fathers
paying 30, 40 or 50 percent of their
income in child support as if they
are childless bachelors.
Braver and Stockburger also
criticize the current guidelines and
the studies upon which they were
based for their assumption that,
excluding child support, a
household's income is only spent on
the members of that household. This
"sacrosanct household" assumption
ignores the many child-related costs
borne by noncustodial parents,
including transportation,
entertainment, and food during
visitation, as well as money spent
on clothes and out-of-pocket medical
and dental expenses.
Also, because most states
generally allow custodial parent
move-aways, noncustodial parents
often shoulder sizable burdens in
travel expenses.
The study accounted for taxes and
noncustodial parent expenses and
examined what a custodial parent
needs to earn in order to enjoy a
standard of living equal to that of
the noncustodial parent. The U.S.
Census data shows that the median
income of the category closely
resembling female divorced custodial
parents is 85% of that of male
noncustodial parents. In six of the
seven states Braver and Stockburger
studied, the median income a
custodial parent needs to earn in
order to have a standard of living
equal to that of the noncustodial
parent is below 85%, often
dramatically so.