Research Shows Non-Custodial Fathers Are Often Generous with Their Children

When awarding child support, courts seem to operate on the assumption that noncustodial fathers will only provide support for their children if forced to by the government, and that money is only spent on children by mothers, not fathers. By contrast, research shows that fathers—when allowed to play a meaningful role in their children’s lives—are often quite generous with their children.

A study conducted by three Arizona State University researchers found that, adjusting for income and standard of living, divorced fathers with joint custody voluntarily contribute even more to their children's college education than the children's mothers do. The three researchers wrote:

"The findings were clear. When we took into account divorced mothers’ and fathers’ financial situations and their ability to pay for college expenses, we found that...mothers and fathers voluntarily contributed remarkably similar proportions of their financial resources to their children’s college education. This occurred in a state that has no statute or case law holding parents to a duty to college support...In joint custody families, fathers contributed more than mothers did..."

In other words, even though most many fathers did not have equal custody rights to their children (i.e. Joint Custody), they still contributed, adjusted for income, as much to their children's college educations as the children's mothers did. When fathers did have equal custody rights, they contributed more than the mothers did.

These findings belie the popular perception that courts must force fathers to pay child support for their college-aged children, or that high-earning fathers will only be generous to their children if forced to.

To read the study, see "Divorced parents’ financial support of their children’s college expenses," Fabricius, W.V., Braver, S.L. & Deneau, K. (2003). Family Court Review, 41(2), 224-241. Also, see Glenn Sacks' column New Study Punctures Myth of the Uncaring Divorced Dad (Newsday, 6/23/03).

Families Against Confiscatory Child Support (FACCS) believes that all parents should support their children, both emotionally and financially. High-earners have an obligation to provide financial support to their children. However, custodial parents often exploit high-earners, obtaining child support orders vastly beyond that which is reasonable to support a child. These windfall or lottery-like child support awards benefit custodial parents, not children. To contact FACCS, email contact@faccsonline.org.

 

 

 

High-Earner Child Support Cases in the News

The Bren Case: A Refreshing Perspective on Child Support
12/28/07

Let the child support negotiations begin
Arizona Daily Star, 8/23/07
"[NFL Star quarterback] Tom Brady’s ex-girlfriend gave birth to a son Wednesday in Los Angeles. Let the child support negotiations begin."

T-Mac Has Child Support Issues
AOL Sports, 8/17/07
"Tracy McGrady is generally known as one of the league's good guys, not to mention one of its most likable...McGrady's attorneys say in court records that the [ex-girlfriend's child support] claim is more about the mother's 'desire for a high lifestyle rather than any reasonable needs of a minor child.'"

Matt Leinart, Brynn Cameron Agree on $15,000 a Month Child Support
AOL Sports, 7/30/07
"Leinart will shell out $15,000 per month in child support, around half of what [ex-girlfriend] Cameron claimed she needed to care for the couple's nine-month-old son, Cole."

Giants' Strahan Said to Weigh Retirement
Associated Press, 7/27/07
"Shrahan considers retirement or is bargaining for more money after his ex was 'awarded $15.3 million along with child support for their twin daughters at $18,000 a month.'"

She Squanders Her Divorce Settlement, so He Has to Pay Her Again--30 Years Later! / UK Alimony Outrage Reversed
Glenn Sacks' Blog, 7/26/07, 7/3/07
"Dennis North gets married and has three kids. His wife cheats on him and they get divorced. Dennis buys her a house and investments as part of the divorce settlement, and raises the three kids himself. Later, he pays her more money, even though she refuses to work. She squanders the money he gave her, and now, 30 years later, guess what? He has to pay her all over again because she's 'fallen on hard times.'"

 

more...